Before You Take Advice Do Your Homework

A visit to a client who had made small but significant changes to both his milking equipment and milking routine based on advice from an engineer had exposed some milking efficient and mastitis risks that he had been unaware of.

A change to a different liner, a small change to system vacuum and a change in the milking routine to ensure that teats were disinfected much sooner after cup removal in his 16 / 32 herringbone were the key alterations that had been made.

Some weeks after he had made these changes, I was requested to undertake a milking time test to warrant that the changes had actually resulted in a reduced risk of mastitis infections and improved milking efficiency.

Teat end damage had been especially significant, it was important to assess and see the results of teat scoring at this milking visit, the teats were blue and significantly teat condition was poor

However, it wasn’t very far into milking when we realised that something was terribly wrong!

The first group of cows had been principally uneasy – cows were swishing their tails, stomping their feet, and units were kicked off. Getting units attached onto the cows had become a nightmare and the milkers were becoming irate and needless to say unhappy!

It was quite clear the cows were not content and the milkers were stressed!

The cows were not flowing through the parlour and once the units were attached and aligned it wasn’t long before they were on the floor.

What was the cause of the sudden onset of this behaviour? Poorly installed milking equipment and advice!

The milkers had noticed over the last few weeks that the machine was irritating the cows, but obviously the equipment had just been installed and it was thought to be perfect for milking, and the number kick offs escalated dramatically, to the point that at this milking the units were being kicked of every other cow

However the dairy farmer had neglected to tell me that he had asked the engineer several times to rectify the problem, with the wise words of the cows will get used to the units

Significant changes had been made with a new type and bore of milking liner and an alteration of the milk and rest phase of the pulsation along with a drop in the vacuum level, reducing the vacuum level extended the unit on time and the cows did not like it plus a wide rest phase increased the compression and the teat meatus was becoming damaged causing irritation and discomfort  

The teat cistern was also compressed causing poor milk flow due to narrow bore of the liner.

The dairy farmer had been told that small bore liners would reduce liner slip and that a wider rest phase and reduction of vacuum level would be kinder to the cow’s teats. r

Why have a Milking – Time Test

The Farmer received my dynamic milking time report it stated he had 70 percent milking efficiency

I explained the reason for this reference was to still further reduce mastitis and maintain milk quality; farmers need to keep milking equipment working correctly. However, milking efficiency should be considered from two other viewpoints, the amount of time the milking cluster is attached to the udder (unit on time) and the percent of unit on time that milk is flowing at or near maximum. When milk isn’t flowing while the unit is attached, it is not only unproductive, but more importantly, damages the teat tissue, which could increase the risk of mastitis and decrease milk yield

A lot of dairy farms have their milking equipment tested and maintained on a routine basis. Although proper equipment function is necessary for milking efficiency, it does not necessarily guarantee it. Two managing areas that could lead to poor milking efficiency are milking routines that don’t achieve consistent milk let down and over milking. Either one of these problems can leave cows “high and dry” for a period of time and expose teats to high vacuum levels. Poor milk let down or what is commonly called bimodal milking.

During teat stimulation before milking, nerves carry an electric signal to the brain. The brain then releases oxytocin into the blood and then to the udder. It takes about 1 to 2 minutes for oxytocin levels to increase in blood to optimally contract muscle cells around the milk ducts, which then squeeze the milk down toward the teats. The two important points about this oxytocin release are enough teat stimulation (at least 10 seconds of actual physical touching) and the duration of the lag time, that is, the time interval between when teats are first stimulated until the cluster is attached. Unfortunately, with increasing herd size, the number of cows that can be milked through the parlour per hour is often identified as one of the choke points of herd capacity. Thus, parlour efficiency is emphasized at the expense of milking efficiency.

Rough handling shouting and general lack of understanding of cows will lead to Adrenalin release.

Most modern milking machines have huge effective reserves so fall-off vacuum is not an issue , even when two units are placed at one time the vacuum on the adjacent cluster is stable ,

Milking machine equipment has evolved so too has the operator who needs to understand the factors of the milking cycle. lsdprior

How does my cow get an udder infection?

The entrance of the udder is known as the streak canal or teat canal.  It is surrounded by a band of muscle tissue that keeps the canal closed.  The cavity within the teat is known as the teat sinus.  It is separated from the udder cistern by a ring of tissue known as the annular ring.  Canals connect to the udder cistern like the branches of a tree and terminate in tiny circular areas known as alveoli which secrete milk.

Defence mechanisms of the streak canal or teat canal

1.  Smooth muscle sphincter surrounding the teat canal inhibits bacterial closure.  Because the teat canal lumen can remain dilated for up to 2 hours after milking

2.  Keratin, a waxy substance derived from the teat canal lining partially occludes the lumen of the teat canal and inhibits bacterial penetration

3.  Somatic Cells are the most important natural defence mechanism to infection.  Leukocytes (mostly PMN, polymorph nuclear neutrophils) function by phagocytosing and killing bacteria.  They may reach in the millions.

4.  Antibodies and other soluble factors in milk.  They coat bacteria and enhance PMN engulfment.  They also interfere with bacterial adhesion to tissues, reducing multiplication and neutralizing toxins.

So how does your cow establish an infection?

1.  The inherent virulence of the bacterial species is often associated with is ability to adhere to mammary epithelium and remain in the gland during lactation when the udder is periodically flushed.  Strep Ag and Staph aureus adhere well.  E. coli does not adhere well but multiplies rapidly.

2.  If bacteria are eliminated by leukocytes, the infection is cleared!

3.  Bacteria initially affect tissues lining the large milking collecting ducts and cisterns.  They enter small ducts and alveolar areas of the gland by multiplication and via milk currents.

4.  Bacteria produce toxins and irritants that cause swelling and death of alveoli.  This results in the release of substances that increase blood vessel permeability and attract PMN to the affected area. `���E

Dry Cows

It seems one of dairy farming most neglected area is the dry cow’s with an added frustration of a mastitis clinical mastitis case alone is shown to cost £350 during the first 30 days in milk.

To prevent mastitis during the dry period, you should first understand the two high-risk period cows can contract an infection

Immediately after dry-off

Right after a cow stops being milked, the udder will become engorged, and her quarters may leak milk. The teats are also no longer being dipped two to three times a day, and bacteria are not being flushed out from milking, making your cows vulnerable to mastitis.

At dry-off, farmers will habitually use an antibiotic to clear up any remaining infections from the previous lactation and to prevent new infections that may occur in the dry cowshed or environment .

Mastitis treatment during the dry period generally results in higher cure rates than during lactation, and it’s the most effective time to treat a subclinical infection.

Ensure the dry cow shed is cleaned and dry, passages are scraped twice daily, beds are cleaned daily, plenty of clean fresh water, think about you stocking limit,

The end of the dry period going into the next lactation

A cow’s udder will start to develop and produce colostrum near the end of the dry period. Once again, her udder will start to fill, and teats may leak. However, now the treatments that were used shortly after dry-off are below what we call the “minimum inhibitory concentration” to be effective against bacteria. Few antibiotics will provide full protection for the entire dry period.

Teat sealants can play a valuable role in defending against mastitis throughout dry-off. They provide a sterile, antibiotic-free physical barrier between the udder and its environment. Sealants also work well in conjunction with antibiotic therapy.

Internal teat sealants have been designed to last across the entire dry period and simulate a cow’s natural first line of defence, the keratin plug; keratin seals the teat end against harmful bacteria. But we need to ensure internal sealants are used properly. The teat end should be thoroughly sanitized before infusion. Without proper hygiene and preparation, organisms present on the teat end may be forced into the udder and can cause infection, especially if gram-negative bacteria are introduced.

During administration the area where the teat joins the udder should be pinched so the sealant is only applied into the teat cistern.

Contact your supplier to introduce an external teat sealant, which could last several days.

The National Mastitis Council’s Recommended Mastitis Control Program suggests using a teat sealant on dry cows exposed to a high level of environmental pathogens

Even with the best management practices in place, mastitis infections after calving do happen

There are a number of resources available for producers looking to improve or refine their dry cow mastitis protocols. The National Mastitis Council is a global organization dedicated to mastitis control and milk quality. Its website ( offers helpful

Going back to basics

A recent farm visit the Dairy farmer was complaining about elevated somatic cell counts long-suffering to the fact that it was never going to change on his farm.

This evaluation was conducted on one farm. Each farm is diverse with different procedures.

Why have you never had consistently low somatic cell count (SCC)? You tried everything to bring your SCC down.

You asked consultants to look at your records and facilities. You use bucket fulls of hydrated lime, and the most expensive sanitizing solutions. You bed with sawdust. During the summer months the cows are clean, yet the SCC is on the margin of a huge deduction.

You have changed teat dips, changed your prepping procedure, you started stripping every cow. You can spend a shed load off money to buy the best and nothing seems to help.

You have been told to stop spraying the floors while cows were in the parlour, still no change. It comes to a point where you think this is as good as it gets so have you given up. What changed? It’s pretty simple start with the basics. No water. At all. Wash your hands as needed, and if a cow literally poops directly on you, you spray it or scrape it away. But while cows are in the parlour, don’t hose anything.

For the first few days you might have a panic attack. Everything is dirty, and it might drive you crazy.

You might find that you are drier and cleaner. If you see a particularly large clump of manure right where you want to put my hand, use a dirty milking towel to clean it off.

The best part? It took a while for the SCC to drop, but it eventually did. The better part? You treat a lot less mastitis. We’ve always talked about how water is the perfect carrier for bacteria never wash units or the walk ways while the cows are in the parlour

Yet most farms I go to still spray water around the cows before after and even during milking

The milkers are wet through after the milking. take a look at yourself are you soaking wet ?

The easy response is we have done it like this for years, has it worked?

It’s a definite NO.

The New Milking Parlour

The first questions that must be answered in order to make balanced decisions about the type and size of milking parlour for a dairy farm are:

What is the desired milking routine? The amount of time required to complete the pre-milking routine on each cow determines the number of milking units and milking stalls that each operator can use effectually. If you want excellent milking routines (teat and udder sanitation, effective stimulation, appropriate prep-lag times) in the parlour, it must be sized to encourage the preferred outcome. A parlour that is too big will encourage the operators to take short cuts and not implement the complete milking routine. A parlour that is too small will result in bored workers and early unit attachment.

What question should you be asking your yourself?

Parlours should be sized to complete the actual milking in 1hour 30 minutes and should allow for future herd expansion. yes someone that milks a thousand cows , however they are normally batched in 250 plus

Herd sizes will continue to grow in the UK. The average herd size is now in excess of 100 cows.

This has increased steadily year on.

Against this trend many farmers are milking in unsuitable parlours and need to invest. With high labour costs, even problems recruiting labour, and higher yielding cows, the recent fashion has been to install milking parlours with a greater number of units to be handled by one operator

Installing a new parlour is an expensive, once in a generation investment and should be planned very carefully.

To remain in business do you need to invest in a new parlour?

What new parlour you will require?

Modern parlour designs have been developed for increased herd size and integrate automation in the herringbone, auto-tandem and rotary configurations. How many cows can I milk per hour comfortably? , can I expand my parlour in the future? , will my cows be comfortable? It is still shocking that cows are tight in the parlour with little concern for their movement –

Who will be operating the parlour?  How many per unit ?The skill level and motivation level of the people in the parlour will determine how efficiently the milking routine will be applied.

Will the parlour be used as a place to provide special treatment to cows? Some parlour types are more suited to providing individual cow care than others.

What is the expected production level, milking interval and cow grouping strategy? These factors will influence the average amount of time that milking units stay on cows.

What sort of work environment do you want to provide for the operators? Some parlour types are wide some are narrow , rotary parlours have static operators , speed of the rotary how fast will it run, are the units coming off half way around , long herringbone parlours take their toll on area covered , do you want territorial milking

With the answers to these questions in hand let’s continue to look at the main types of milking parlours in use today.

 Tandem Parlour

Side opener parlours usually are located on the end of a holding area with two entrance lanes similar to herringbone and parallel parlours. A gate at the entrance point between the holding area and the milking parlour holds the cow until an empty stall is ready. The parlour may be organized to allow the cows to exit in return lanes on either side of the operator area or cross over to a single return lane on one side. The use of a single return lane (compared to dual returns) reduces not only the cost of the parlour itself but also the facilities to catch and/or sort cows when leaving the parlour. A single return lane does not slow down cow flow in this parlour type because cows are released individually.

Side opening, tandem and in line parlours handle cows one at a time so a slow-milking cow does not delay the end of milking and release of other cows in the parlour. These parlours are well suited to farms that take special care about observing individual cows and practice individual cow care in the parlour. The throughput of these parlours is less affected by variations in cow milk out times the number of stalls in a side-opening parlour is usually limited to 4 to 8 for one operator and 8 to 12 for two operators. Stall lengths quickly add up to excessive walking time and difficulty in keeping track of distant milking machines. These parlours have received a recent return to interest because of extra computer controlled automation. If auto detachers are used, the detacher can signal that a unit has been removed and the cow automatically let out, the gate closes and another cow is allowed to enter the stall.

This parlour type has a high stall use rate (7 to 8 cows/stall/hour) which makes it an economical choice for farms using a high level of automation and technology and is well suited to farms with up to about 200 cows that practice a high level of management. This parlour type is not easily expandable, but if designed properly can be converted into a herringbone or parallel parlour with more milking stalls in the future.

Herringbone Parlour

Herringbone parlours are the most common parlour type in the UK, Cows stand on an elevated platform in an angled or herringbone facing away from the operator area. This exposes enough of the back half of the cow to allow access to milk her from the side and room for an arm type detacher and supplementary equipment.

Herringbone parlours are located on the end of a rectangular collection area allowing cows to enter single file as a group directly into either side of the parlour. Once milked the cows exit single file by walking straight ahead and out of the parlour. In most layouts the cows make either a 180-degree turn down a return lane back past the holding area or a 90-degree turn and out a side door or across the parlour to a return lane on the other side. Parlours with more than 12 stalls on a side benefit from rapid exit stalls to speed up the exiting process. In this case the cows walk straight away from the operator area in to a wide exit area. Normal design has a return lane on either side so cows go directly from the exit area past the holding area. However, cows on one side can be directed across to a single return lane on the other side.

Parallel Parlour

Cows stand on an elevated platform at a 90-degree angle facing away from the operator area. Access to the udder is between the rear legs, which reduces visibility of the front quarters and can make unit attachment and udder user sanitation more difficult. This configuration makes the walking distance shorter than in a herringbone parlour. The cow platform is wider than a herringbone parlour to accommodate the length of the cow. Stall fronts use small gates to position each cow. To assure that each position is filled in order, a series of interlocking fronts prevent a position from being used until the one next to it has been occupied. Most parallel parlours use rapid exit stall fronts and use dual return lanes. The stall spacing in this parlour type is critical. It is also more difficult to balance milking units on the udder in this parlour. Cows can have foot issues as they turn on a steep angle.

Swing-over Parlour

Swing over parlours the cows are placed at a greater angle from the operator (about 70 degrees) than in traditional herringbones but less than 90 degrees as in a parallel. This configuration usually eliminates the need for front positioners as used in a parallel. The sharp angle does not expose enough of the cow’s body to allow milking from the side, however. Procedures and equipment developed for milking between the hind legs are used. Milk lines are typically mounted as “mid-level” or above the head of the operator resulting in a lift from the udder to milk line of about 1 meter.

The width of the pit can vary between 5-8 feet, depending on the length of parlour and number of operators. Cows can exit single file to the front end of the parlour or to the sides of the parlour using a rapid exit type front. Maximum cow movement efficiency is attained when cows walk straight in from the holding area and exit straight out, without turning. It is recommended that the cow platform be extended 2-3 cows beyond the pit into the holding area to position these cows behind the last cow to be milked An adjustable breast rail allows adjustment of the line of cows to position the rump up against the rump rail to position the udder as close as possible to the operator pit. The rump rail can be a straight rail or an “S” rail and is usually located directly above the edge of the cow platform. A hock rail is placed approximately 8 inches below the rump rail to prevent cows kicking backward and stepping off the platform. A manure splashguard can be placed above the rump rail to direct manure to the platform instead of the pit.

The primary advantage of a swing parlour is that fewer milking units are needed and stall designs are simpler, both of which reduce the initial cost of the parlour. The main disadvantage is this parlour type is clutter and (especially for a slow milking cow and/or cow requiring special attention. This parlour type is not suited to the use of support devices and automatic detachers are typically mounted above the milk line.

Rotary Parlour

The advantage of the rotary parlour is that the cow movement functions are largely automated, freeing the operators to tasks more directly associated with milking. Rotary parlours typically require three operators: one for unit attachment, one to apply pre milking teat dip and one to tend to any problems occurring while cows are traveling around (reattach units, tend to liner lips, etc.). This parlour type is not expandable. And the capital cost is usually higher per stall than for non-moving parlours. Because of these characteristics, rotary parlours are best suited to larger herds (>600 cows). One advantage of a rotary parlour is that the work routine very territorial and constant. Milking procedures will in general be much more consistent and efficient in a large rotary parlour (60 stalls) than in an equivalently sized herringbone or parallel parlour (double 30). Rotary parlours usually use a ‘face-in’ configuration and are subject to all of the same disadvantages of a parallel milking parlour. It is more difficult to provide any special cow care on a rotary platform than a static parlour. “

Cows should not be forced to stand for longer than is absolutely necessary, particularly in collecting yards, and where herds are separated into groups for milking, any opportunities to manage these groups in such a manner that standing times can be reduced should be investigated, so that cows do not have to stand too long with extra pressure on their hooves

When cows raise their heads up over the backs of other cows, it is an indication that there is not enough space available and additional pressure will be put on the feet through cows pushing and being less able to place their feet comfortably

Backing gates, while making a significant labour-saving contribution, need to be used carefully – particularly the heavy-framed type that work by pushing cows by force – as often the cows standing at the back of the yard are either already suffering from mobility problems that will be exacerbated by being forced to move, or are more nervous and at greater risk of injury from slipping.

Keep Calm

The latest dairy cow study has never been more exciting from researchers worldwide

The Dairy Industry is growing fast because some of the dairy farms are using latest technologies. These verities of technologies are planned to increase effectiveness and better cow management; along with increasing farm profitability and productivity.

However the latest research paper is a simple as can be, now I know a lot of progressive farmers would say well we knew that any way, I can assure some farmers are not and have never been aware and to publish a paper to reiterate that a study undertaken can have a valued result on you cows and milk production

So what’s it all about, it’s quite simple keep the routine consistent keep cow’s calm, adrenalin secretion prior to milk harvesting blocks milk release and reduces yield

The study found that a consistent routine will aid good let down, oxytocin release and calm cows increased yield up to 20 %

Bimodal milking is poor milking efficiency, cows that were excited and in fear, figures showed a reduction in milk yield.

So keeping your cows calm stress free increases milk production, why not give it a try, create an optimal milking environment  

Cows are a creature of habit consistency is the key trying to hurry and exciting cows has a detrimental effect on milk harvesting.

The study focused on the milkers, cow entry and cow exit

The study showed that different preparation resulted in poor let down different milkers with different attitudes affected milk harvest, shouting and whistling affected cow entry

Forcing cows into the milking parlour

And forcing cows out had an impact on cow stress.

The milking equipment was checked and adjusted to cause as little distress and pain.

The Milking Machine and its Failings

Milking systems have progressed over the years with the introduction of new technology and automation however the principle of milk removal from the teat has changed very little

This has provided the dairy farmer with improvements in productivity by reducing the labour involved in the milking process. Unfortunately there are some basic functional problems with the milking equipment that causes poor milking performance and reduced milk quality.

Evidence is provided of why conventional milking systems in use today do not work well. It explains why cows do not milk out well, why their teats are irritated and what causes liner crawl and incomplete milk out.

There have been many attempts in the past 40 years to improve the performance of conventional milking systems. The known performance problems include liner slip, teat crawl, teat damage, teat irritation/pain and incomplete milking. These attempts have produced numerous inventions by the major milking equipment manufacturers.

When there is no milk flow biphasic milking phase and end milk phase the teat becomes flaccid and its frictional engagement with the milking liner less stable, whereby the teat tends to be sucked deeper into the teat cup. Thus, each teat cup crawls on the teat towards the udder and thereby causes strangulation of the milk conducting interior of the teat close to the udder, so that milking becomes more difficult and finally the milk flow completely ceases in spite of the fact that some milk still remains in the udder.

Various attempts have been made to improve the effects of vacuum on the teat by carefully shaping the teat cup and liner to support the teat as well as possible including fluted .square or triangular liners

A milking machine exposes the cow’s teat tips to a relatively strong milking vacuum, usually about 40-50 kPa. (40-50 kPa is 11.8 to 14.8 in Hg) along with liner compression this strong milking vacuum and force means that the teats could be in pain initially during the milking, when the milk flow is low or non-existing, This may lead to that the hormone adrenaline is secreted and makes continued milk extraction difficult.

A high milking vacuum is needed primarily for ensuring a safe attachment of the teat cups to the teats and, secondary, for achieving a rapid milking and a high milk yield. However, a disadvantage of such a high milking vacuum could distress the teats, especially at the beginning and at the end of the milking interval when there is no or insignificant milk flow through one or more teats.

A low milking vacuum while it is safe to say the pressure on the teat is less it may cause slow incomplete milking due to impaction off milk on the teat end, this in turn will cause distress and release adrenalin the cow stops milk release.

Milking Machines are not perfect at the moment its all we have.

Having your milking equipment to its optimised performance is essential, training staff to understand the consequences of poor milkability should be a fundamental objective.

Troubleshooting Problems with Low Milk Production

These are just a few points to look at

Milking machine construction and performances may be directly related to the milking ability of animals in order to milk quickly, completely and gently, to maintain healthy udders and to produce milk with a high quality level.

Milking machines are rapidly changing in size and design with the increase in herd size. Milking parlours on large farms operate for more than 15 h day with cows milked three times a day. While no one design is perfect, the following factors will impact milking parlour design and style:

It is often assumed that the milking machine is working properly and operated correctly. But it’s risky to think that as long as the motors run and milk flows through the pipeline, everything is correct.

This may or may not be true. The two major problems with milking systems are malfunctioning equipment and operator mismanagement.

The problems can occur individually or concurrently. In either case, the dairy farmer increases his chances of lowering milk production and, ultimately, lowering income. Research shows a high connection between the incidence of mastitis and poorly functioning or poorly operated milking equipment. Mastitis is not a new disease. It was recognized and studied even before the milking machine was invented. Because the dairy industry became more reliant on efficient milking operations, the milking machine is now used on nearly every dairy farm. In many cases, when a dairy herd’s incidence of mastitis increases, the first area to be targeted is the milking equipment. The milking system can be adjusted or adapted to function properly, but other factors can contribute to this problem.

Raising the working vacuum level or even lowering the vacuum level can have catastrophic consequences making adjustments to your milking machine without understanding what happens at the claw is naïve  

Cows are usually milked twice daily. Milking twice a day yields at least 40% more milk

Than once a day… Increasing milking frequency to 3 x day increases milk yield by up to

20% (range 5-20%). The increase is usually highest for first lactation cow and declines

As the cow gets older. The most likely reasons for increased milk production is milking


Residual milk can be defined as the amount of milk left in the udder after milking is

Completed. About 10-20% of total milk is left in the udder as residual milk.

The dry period effect is related to body condition of the cow at calving. Cows in

Good body condition at calving produce higher milk yield during the following lactation

Than in cows in thin body condition at calving.

Evaluate the herd for a high incidence of subclinical or clinical mastitis. Check individual milk samples from all milking cows using cell count. The average somatic cell count should be under 300,000. In the whole herd, 10% or less of the cows should have a positive 2 or higher CMT on a composite of four quarters or positive 3 in one or more quarters on quarter samples. At least 70% of the cows on a somatic cell counting program should show a linear score of 1 and 2. Teat end health may be a problem if more than 20% of the teats show evidence of erosion, eversion, cuts, or sores. Check both the milking system and milking practices. Culture milk samples and run sensitivity tests when warranted. Establish both pre- and post-teat dipping and routine dry cow treatments with recommended products. Nutritional parameters to check are current levels of protein, zinc, selenium, and vitamins A and E. Examine and screen the ration or individual feeds for moulds and mycotoxins.

Underfeeding grain to fresh cows can lower peak milk production. Gradually increase grain intake from about 1% of body weight to about 2% of body weight by two weeks after calving.

Complications around freshening time, such as mastitis, metritis, ketosis, and displaced abomasum can impact peak milk. Improper dry cow nutrition, especially during the close-up period, can have an effect. Check the transition diets and feeding practices carefully, as well as the early dry period.

Debilitating conditions like feet and leg problems, lung damage from pneumonia or lungworms, and intestinal damage from severe enteritis or parasitism can lower peak milk.

Adequate forage dry matter intake and effective fibre are needed to maintain normal rumen function and milk production. Cows should receive a minimum of 1.4% of their body weight in forage dry matter. Forage and total neutral detergent fibre intake should be maintained at minimum levels of 0.80% and 1.20% of body weight, respectively.

Serious ration deficiencies or imbalances in energy, protein, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, sulphur, and salt can contribute to reduced peak milk.

When anaemia is severe or persistent, production can be adversely affected. Possible causes include deficiencies in protein, iron, copper, cobalt, or selenium. External or internal parasitism can cause severe anaemia.

Serious over-conditioning of cows during late lactation or the dry period may reduce total feed intake at next freshening. It may also increase the incidence of metabolic problems at calving, especially ketosis.

Any restriction in feed or water supply will result in a drop in milk production. The most

Dramatic effect is brought about by shortage of water as the cow has no means of storing

Water. Withholding access to water or insufficient supply of water for few hours will

Result in a rapid drop in milk yield.

Overcrowding animals in a free-stall operation can limit production. If cows stand excessively, this can cause fatigue stress and may affect milk production.

Stray voltage should be examined when other obvious factors appear normal.

Check records to see if dry cows have had a dry period of seven to eight weeks.

The Modern Milking System

Testing your milking machine is one of the most important requirements on a modern dairy farm; part of the milking machine test is fall-off and vacuum recovery especially with advanced vacuum on demand software or variable speed vacuum installations it is essential that these units are working correctly and efficiently.

In older parlours with older vacuum pumps, these parlours rarely past the test, milkers had to be careful to minimize the amount of air being drawn through the claw as milking units were attached. Now, with better technology and more advanced, higher capacity vacuum systems, units can be attached much faster with less worry about air slippage.

Attaching milking units and ensuring those units hang correctly under the udder during milking.

Modern milking machinery has huge vacuum reserves enabling adjacent units to very rarely lose any vacuum.

Having greater vacuum capacity requires the correct vacuum level ensuring little distress or teat damage

Some companies have no airflow at the claw until the unit is attached aiding the milkers and reducing air loss to virtually nothing.

Milking system optimization not only leads to better overall milk quality, but it’s also good for your cows and can have a positive impact on employee attitude and performance.

While many farmers have a scheduled service program, they do not always have their milking systems optimized – there is a huge difference. There is also dissimilarity between having a system analysis conducted and having a system working for your cows.

The milking system needs to be effective or well-designed. No milking system is perfect, but we can strive to get as close as possible.

Everything from cow flow to the parlour and proper pre-milking and post-milking routines should be evaluated. Are steps in place to get cows in and out of the parlour as calmly and quickly as possible? Are the cows staying clean to minimize the risk of mastitis?

Not all milking systems should be or can be optimized. For example, attempting to improve the functionality of a poorly installed or maintained system can yield few results, and often leads to other issues. Milking faster when you have a poor air flow will cause cows to milk slower and can result in udder health issues. e